LangSmith vs Weights & Biases Weave

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

LangSmith

🔴Developer

AI Observability

LangSmith is LangChain's commercial observability, evaluation and prompt management platform for LLM apps and agents in production.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Free

Weights & Biases Weave

🔴Developer

AI Observability

An observability and evaluation toolkit for tracing generative-AI applications, comparing outputs, managing evaluation datasets, and inspecting model behavior.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Custom

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

FeatureLangSmithWeights & Biases Weave
CategoryAI ObservabilityAI Observability
Pricing Plans3 listed plansPlan details unavailable
Starting PriceFreeCustom
Key Features
  • • Tracing for any LLM stack via Python/TypeScript SDKs or OpenTelemetry
  • • LLM-as-judge, code-based and pairwise evaluations
  • • Versioned prompts with production A/B traffic splits
  • • LLM tracing
  • • evaluations
  • • datasets

LangSmith - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • ✓Best-in-class integration if you already use LangChain or LangGraph.
  • ✓Eval suites are practical enough to actually gate releases on, not just dashboards.
  • ✓Self-hosted Enterprise tier covers SOC 2 and regulated environments.

Cons

  • ✗Per-trace pricing on Plus surprises teams that scale production traffic quickly.
  • ✗Non-LangChain stacks work but trade ergonomic polish for SDK overhead.
  • ✗Some eval features require additional LLM spend on top of the platform fee.

Weights & Biases Weave - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • ✓Captures traces, evaluation results, datasets, output comparisons, and cost or latency signals in one workflow gives the product a concrete position rather than a generic AI feature set
  • ✓LLM tracing and evaluations support a bounded pilot with observable outputs
  • ✓cost and latency visibility and W&B integration broaden the workflow without requiring a separate point tool

Cons

  • ✗Current plan prices, quotas, and overage terms could not be verified from the vendor during this run
  • ✗Teams must test whether llm tracing remains reliable on production-shaped inputs and failure cases
  • ✗Security, retention, export, support, and model-training terms require direct vendor confirmation before sensitive use

Not sure which to pick?

🎯 Take our quiz →

🔒 Security & Compliance Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

Security FeatureLangSmithWeights & Biases Weave
SOC2✅ Yes—
GDPR✅ Yes—
HIPAA——
SSO✅ Yes—
Self-Hosted🔀 Hybrid—
On-Prem✅ Yes—
RBAC✅ Yes—
Audit Log✅ Yes—
Open Source❌ No—
API Key Auth✅ Yes—
Encryption at Rest✅ Yes—
Encryption in Transit✅ Yes—
Data ResidencyUS, EU—
Data Retentionconfigurable—
🦞

New to AI tools?

Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

🔔

Price Drop Alerts

Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

Tracking 2 tools

We only email when prices actually change. No spam, ever.

Get weekly AI agent tool insights

Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ready to Choose?

Read the full reviews to make an informed decision