LangSmith vs Helicone

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

LangSmith

🔴Developer

AI Observability

LangSmith is LangChain's commercial observability, evaluation and prompt management platform for LLM apps and agents in production.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Free

Helicone

🔴Developer

LLM Observability

Open-source LLM observability and AI gateway — logs every prompt, response, cost, and latency across 20+ providers with a one-line proxy or async SDK, plus caching, retries, and prompt experiments.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Free

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

FeatureLangSmithHelicone
CategoryAI ObservabilityLLM Observability
Pricing Plans59 tiers4 tiers
Starting PriceFreeFree
Key Features
  • Tracing for any LLM stack via Python/TypeScript SDKs or OpenTelemetry
  • LLM-as-judge, code-based and pairwise evaluations
  • Versioned prompts with production A/B traffic splits
  • Proxy-Based Request Logging
  • Cost Analytics & Budget Alerts
  • Gateway-Level Caching

💡 Our Take

Choose LangSmith if you need deep evaluation tooling, prompt versioning, and hierarchical agent traces tied to the LangChain ecosystem. Choose Helicone if you primarily need a lightweight proxy-based observability layer for OpenAI/Anthropic API calls with caching and rate limiting, and want simpler setup at a lower starting price.

LangSmith - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Best-in-class integration if you already use LangChain or LangGraph.
  • Eval suites are practical enough to actually gate releases on, not just dashboards.
  • Self-hosted Enterprise tier covers SOC 2 and regulated environments.

Cons

  • Per-trace pricing on Plus surprises teams that scale production traffic quickly.
  • Non-LangChain stacks work but trade ergonomic polish for SDK overhead.
  • Some eval features require additional LLM spend on top of the platform fee.

Helicone - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • 5-minute proxy integration captures full traces, cost, and latency across 20+ providers
  • Real AI gateway features (caching, retries, fallback, key vault) replace a custom proxy
  • MIT-licensed and self-hostable on Postgres + ClickHouse — passes regulated procurement

Cons

  • Proxy mode adds a network hop unless self-hosted in your own region
  • Prompt experiment UX is less mature than dedicated eval platforms like Braintrust
  • Self-hosting requires running ClickHouse, which is an extra ops surface

Not sure which to pick?

🎯 Take our quiz →

🔒 Security & Compliance Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

Security FeatureLangSmithHelicone
SOC2✅ Yes✅ Yes
GDPR✅ Yes✅ Yes
HIPAA❌ No
SSO✅ Yes✅ Yes
Self-Hosted🔀 Hybrid✅ Yes
On-Prem✅ Yes✅ Yes
RBAC✅ Yes✅ Yes
Audit Log✅ Yes✅ Yes
Open Source❌ No✅ Yes
API Key Auth✅ Yes✅ Yes
Encryption at Rest✅ Yes✅ Yes
Encryption in Transit✅ Yes✅ Yes
Data ResidencyUS, EUUS, EU
Data Retentionconfigurableconfigurable
🦞

New to AI tools?

Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

🔔

Price Drop Alerts

Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

Tracking 2 tools

We only email when prices actually change. No spam, ever.

Get weekly AI agent tool insights

Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ready to Choose?

Read the full reviews to make an informed decision