Langfuse vs Portkey

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

Langfuse

🔴Developer

AI observability

An open-source observability and evaluation platform for language-model applications.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Free

Portkey

🔴Developer

AI gateway

An AI gateway and control platform for routing, observing, and governing model traffic.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Custom

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

FeatureLangfusePortkey
CategoryAI observabilityAI gateway
Pricing Plans38 tiers97 tiers
Starting PriceFree
Key Features
  • • Hierarchical Tracing & Agent Debugging
  • • Production Prompt Management & Versioning
  • • LLM-as-Judge Evaluation Framework

    Langfuse - Pros & Cons

    Pros

    • ✓Open source with free self-hosting — full feature parity without usage limits
    • ✓Free Hobby tier on cloud with no credit card — lowest barrier to entry in the category
    • ✓Trace graphs for multi-agent systems are genuinely useful for debugging complex failures
    • ✓Prompt management + evals turns prompt engineering into a systematic, measurable process
    • ✓40,000+ builders using it — extensive community resources and integrations
    • ✓Integrates natively with LangChain, LlamaIndex, OpenAI SDK, and Anthropic

    Cons

    • ✗Pro plan units pricing ($8/100k) can add up for high-volume production applications
    • ✗Enterprise SSO requires the $300/month Teams add-on on top of Pro — costly for mid-size teams
    • ✗Self-hosting requires Docker/Kubernetes operational knowledge
    • ✗UI can feel overwhelming for teams who just want simple cost/latency dashboards
    • ✗Real-time alerting features are less developed than commercial-first alternatives like Arize
    • ✗Enterprise tier at $2,499/month is priced for large organizations — no mid-market option

    Portkey - Pros & Cons

    Pros

    • ✓Provider-agnostic routing with declarative configs that an SRE can change without app deploys
    • ✓Strong governance primitives (virtual keys, budgets, RBAC) that internal gateways usually skip
    • ✓Built-in guardrails and observability remove the need for a separate vendor for each
    • ✓Self-hosted and BYOC options make it viable for regulated and air-gapped deployments

    Cons

    • ✗Pricing page is JS-rendered and dollar amounts must be confirmed manually on site
    • ✗Adds a network hop and latency overhead — small but non-zero next to direct provider calls
    • ✗Overkill for single-provider single-app teams who do not need governance
    • ✗Some advanced features (Agents, BYOC) require Enterprise contracts

    Not sure which to pick?

    🎯 Take our quiz →

    🔒 Security & Compliance Comparison

    Scroll horizontally to compare details.

    Security FeatureLangfusePortkey
    SOC2✅ Yes—
    GDPR✅ Yes—
    HIPAA✅ Yes—
    SSO✅ Yes—
    Self-Hosted——
    On-Prem✅ Yes—
    RBAC✅ Yes—
    Audit Log✅ Yes—
    Open Source✅ Yes—
    API Key Auth✅ Yes—
    Encryption at Rest✅ Yes—
    Encryption in Transit✅ Yes—
    Data ResidencyUS, EU, SELF-HOSTED—
    Data Retentionconfigurable—
    🦞

    New to AI tools?

    Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

    🔔

    Price Drop Alerts

    Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

    Tracking 2 tools

    We only email when prices actually change. No spam, ever.

    Get weekly AI agent tool insights

    Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

    No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

    Ready to Choose?

    Read the full reviews to make an informed decision