Langfuse vs LangSmith

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

Langfuse

🔴Developer

LLM Observability

Langfuse is an open-source LLM observability and engineering platform providing tracing, prompt management, evaluations, and dataset management for production AI applications.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Free

LangSmith

🔴Developer

AI Observability

LangSmith is LangChain's commercial observability, evaluation and prompt management platform for LLM apps and agents in production.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Free

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

FeatureLangfuseLangSmith
CategoryLLM ObservabilityAI Observability
Pricing Plans38 tiers59 tiers
Starting PriceFreeFree
Key Features
  • Hierarchical Tracing & Agent Debugging
  • Production Prompt Management & Versioning
  • LLM-as-Judge Evaluation Framework
  • Tracing for any LLM stack via Python/TypeScript SDKs or OpenTelemetry
  • LLM-as-judge, code-based and pairwise evaluations
  • Versioned prompts with production A/B traffic splits

💡 Our Take

Choose LangSmith if you're a LangChain or LangGraph user who values first-party auto-instrumentation, polished UX, and don't need self-hosting. Choose Langfuse if you need MIT-licensed open-source software you can self-host for free at any scale, want framework neutrality, or have high-volume production workloads where pay-per-trace pricing becomes prohibitive.

Langfuse - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Open source with free self-hosting — full feature parity without usage limits
  • Free Hobby tier on cloud with no credit card — lowest barrier to entry in the category
  • Trace graphs for multi-agent systems are genuinely useful for debugging complex failures
  • Prompt management + evals turns prompt engineering into a systematic, measurable process
  • 40,000+ builders using it — extensive community resources and integrations
  • Integrates natively with LangChain, LlamaIndex, OpenAI SDK, and Anthropic

Cons

  • Pro plan units pricing ($8/100k) can add up for high-volume production applications
  • Enterprise SSO requires the $300/month Teams add-on on top of Pro — costly for mid-size teams
  • Self-hosting requires Docker/Kubernetes operational knowledge
  • UI can feel overwhelming for teams who just want simple cost/latency dashboards
  • Real-time alerting features are less developed than commercial-first alternatives like Arize
  • Enterprise tier at $2,499/month is priced for large organizations — no mid-market option

LangSmith - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Best-in-class integration if you already use LangChain or LangGraph.
  • Eval suites are practical enough to actually gate releases on, not just dashboards.
  • Self-hosted Enterprise tier covers SOC 2 and regulated environments.

Cons

  • Per-trace pricing on Plus surprises teams that scale production traffic quickly.
  • Non-LangChain stacks work but trade ergonomic polish for SDK overhead.
  • Some eval features require additional LLM spend on top of the platform fee.

Not sure which to pick?

🎯 Take our quiz →

🔒 Security & Compliance Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

Security FeatureLangfuseLangSmith
SOC2✅ Yes✅ Yes
GDPR✅ Yes✅ Yes
HIPAA✅ Yes
SSO✅ Yes✅ Yes
Self-Hosted🔀 Hybrid
On-Prem✅ Yes✅ Yes
RBAC✅ Yes✅ Yes
Audit Log✅ Yes✅ Yes
Open Source✅ Yes❌ No
API Key Auth✅ Yes✅ Yes
Encryption at Rest✅ Yes✅ Yes
Encryption in Transit✅ Yes✅ Yes
Data ResidencyUS, EU, SELF-HOSTEDUS, EU
Data Retentionconfigurableconfigurable
🦞

New to AI tools?

Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

🔔

Price Drop Alerts

Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

Tracking 2 tools

We only email when prices actually change. No spam, ever.

Get weekly AI agent tool insights

Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ready to Choose?

Read the full reviews to make an informed decision