Langfuse vs LangSmith

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

Langfuse

🔴Developer

Business Analytics

Open-source LLM engineering platform for traces, prompts, and metrics.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Free

LangSmith

🔴Developer

Business Analytics

Tracing, evaluation, and observability for LLM apps and agents.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Free

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

FeatureLangfuseLangSmith
CategoryBusiness AnalyticsBusiness Analytics
Pricing Plans19 tiers15 tiers
Starting PriceFreeFree
Key Features
  • Workflow Runtime
  • Tool and API Connectivity
  • State and Context Handling
  • Workflow Runtime
  • Tool and API Connectivity
  • State and Context Handling

Langfuse - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Fully open-source with self-hosting that has complete feature parity with the cloud version
  • Hierarchical tracing captures the full execution tree of complex agent workflows, not just LLM calls
  • Prompt management with versioning and production linking creates a tight iteration feedback loop
  • Native integrations with LangChain, LlamaIndex, OpenAI SDK, and Vercel AI SDK require minimal code changes
  • Evaluation system supports both automated LLM-as-judge scoring and human annotation queues

Cons

  • Dashboard analytics are functional but less polished than commercial observability platforms for executive reporting
  • UI performance degrades noticeably with very large trace volumes (millions of traces)
  • ClickHouse dependency for self-hosting adds operational complexity compared to PostgreSQL-only setups
  • Documentation can lag behind feature releases, especially for newer evaluation and dataset features

LangSmith - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Comprehensive observability with detailed trace visualization
  • Native MCP support for universal agent tool deployment
  • Generous free tier for individual developers and small projects
  • No-code Agent Builder reduces technical barriers
  • Managed deployment infrastructure with production-ready scaling
  • Strong integration with entire LangChain ecosystem

Cons

  • Primarily designed for LangChain applications (limited framework support)
  • Steep pricing jump from Plus to Enterprise tier
  • Pay-as-you-go model can become expensive for high-volume applications
  • Enterprise features require annual contracts
  • 14-day retention on base traces may be insufficient for some use cases

Not sure which to pick?

🎯 Take our quiz →

🔒 Security & Compliance Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

Security FeatureLangfuseLangSmith
SOC2✅ Yes✅ Yes
GDPR✅ Yes✅ Yes
HIPAA
SSO✅ Yes✅ Yes
Self-Hosted🔀 Hybrid🔀 Hybrid
On-Prem✅ Yes✅ Yes
RBAC✅ Yes✅ Yes
Audit Log✅ Yes✅ Yes
Open Source✅ Yes❌ No
API Key Auth✅ Yes✅ Yes
Encryption at Rest✅ Yes✅ Yes
Encryption in Transit✅ Yes✅ Yes
Data ResidencyUS, EUUS, EU
Data Retentionconfigurableconfigurable
🦞

New to AI tools?

Learn how to run your first agent with OpenClaw

🔔

Price Drop Alerts

Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

Tracking 2 tools

We only email when prices actually change. No spam, ever.

Get weekly AI agent tool insights

Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ready to Choose?

Read the full reviews to make an informed decision