Langfuse vs Helicone

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

Langfuse

🔴Developer

LLM Observability

Langfuse is an open-source LLM observability and engineering platform providing tracing, prompt management, evaluations, and dataset management for production AI applications.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Free

Helicone

🔴Developer

LLM Observability

Open-source LLM observability and AI gateway — logs every prompt, response, cost, and latency across 20+ providers with a one-line proxy or async SDK, plus caching, retries, and prompt experiments.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Free

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

FeatureLangfuseHelicone
CategoryLLM ObservabilityLLM Observability
Pricing Plans38 tiers4 tiers
Starting PriceFreeFree
Key Features
  • Hierarchical Tracing & Agent Debugging
  • Production Prompt Management & Versioning
  • LLM-as-Judge Evaluation Framework
  • Proxy-Based Request Logging
  • Cost Analytics & Budget Alerts
  • Gateway-Level Caching

💡 Our Take

Choose Helicone if your priority is cost analytics, caching, and rate limiting with a 5-minute proxy setup that requires no SDK installation. Choose Langfuse if you need deep multi-step agent tracing, prompt management, and evaluation workflows with parent-child span hierarchies. Many teams use both — Helicone at the gateway for cost controls, Langfuse via SDK for tracing depth.

Langfuse - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Open source with free self-hosting — full feature parity without usage limits
  • Free Hobby tier on cloud with no credit card — lowest barrier to entry in the category
  • Trace graphs for multi-agent systems are genuinely useful for debugging complex failures
  • Prompt management + evals turns prompt engineering into a systematic, measurable process
  • 40,000+ builders using it — extensive community resources and integrations
  • Integrates natively with LangChain, LlamaIndex, OpenAI SDK, and Anthropic

Cons

  • Pro plan units pricing ($8/100k) can add up for high-volume production applications
  • Enterprise SSO requires the $300/month Teams add-on on top of Pro — costly for mid-size teams
  • Self-hosting requires Docker/Kubernetes operational knowledge
  • UI can feel overwhelming for teams who just want simple cost/latency dashboards
  • Real-time alerting features are less developed than commercial-first alternatives like Arize
  • Enterprise tier at $2,499/month is priced for large organizations — no mid-market option

Helicone - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • 5-minute proxy integration captures full traces, cost, and latency across 20+ providers
  • Real AI gateway features (caching, retries, fallback, key vault) replace a custom proxy
  • MIT-licensed and self-hostable on Postgres + ClickHouse — passes regulated procurement

Cons

  • Proxy mode adds a network hop unless self-hosted in your own region
  • Prompt experiment UX is less mature than dedicated eval platforms like Braintrust
  • Self-hosting requires running ClickHouse, which is an extra ops surface

Not sure which to pick?

🎯 Take our quiz →

🔒 Security & Compliance Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

Security FeatureLangfuseHelicone
SOC2✅ Yes✅ Yes
GDPR✅ Yes✅ Yes
HIPAA✅ Yes❌ No
SSO✅ Yes✅ Yes
Self-Hosted✅ Yes
On-Prem✅ Yes✅ Yes
RBAC✅ Yes✅ Yes
Audit Log✅ Yes✅ Yes
Open Source✅ Yes✅ Yes
API Key Auth✅ Yes✅ Yes
Encryption at Rest✅ Yes✅ Yes
Encryption in Transit✅ Yes✅ Yes
Data ResidencyUS, EU, SELF-HOSTEDUS, EU
Data Retentionconfigurableconfigurable
🦞

New to AI tools?

Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

🔔

Price Drop Alerts

Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

Tracking 2 tools

We only email when prices actually change. No spam, ever.

Get weekly AI agent tool insights

Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ready to Choose?

Read the full reviews to make an informed decision