Kilo Code vs Augment Code

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

Kilo Code

🔴Developer

Developer Tools

Open-source VS Code coding agent forked from Cline and Roo Code, with multi-mode workflows, MCP support, and direct access to frontier models without provider markup.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Custom
Full ReviewVisit Site

Augment Code

🔴Developer

Developer Tools

Augment Code is an AI coding assistant and agentic development platform built for large-codebase context, engineering workflows, and teams.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Custom
Full ReviewVisit Site

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

FeatureKilo CodeAugment Code
CategoryDeveloper ToolsDeveloper Tools
Pricing Plans6 tiers4 tiers
Starting Price
Key Features
    • • Context Engine for large-codebase understanding across organizational repositories
    • • Cosmos platform coordinating agents across triage, authoring, review, and verification
    • • MCP and native tools listed in pricing, plus SOC 2 Type II and no-AI-training language

    Kilo Code - Pros & Cons

    Pros

    • ✓Open source and free — easy to fork or audit
    • ✓Mode system gives more discipline than single-prompt agents like Cline
    • ✓BYOK avoids vendor markup on inference
    • ✓Native MCP client means it slots into existing tool stacks
    • ✓Active community combining Cline and Roo Code user bases

    Cons

    • ✗VS Code only — no JetBrains support yet
    • ✗Mode system has a learning curve compared to Cursor's seamless inline chat
    • ✗Cloud offering is new and pricing terms shift
    • ✗Fewer polish details than commercial competitors (no native team admin)

    Augment Code - Pros & Cons

    Pros

    • ✓Pricing is specific: Indie $20/month, Standard $60/developer/month, Max $200/developer/month, Enterprise custom
    • ✓Vendor claims operational metrics such as 4x ship-cycle improvement, 70%+ pages resolved early, and 30% fewer engineering hours
    • ✓Designed for organizations and large codebases, not only solo autocomplete use

    Cons

    • ✗Credit allowances require operational tracking, especially for teams running agents heavily
    • ✗The strongest organizational features are likely most valuable on higher tiers or Enterprise
    • ✗Teams with small repos may not need its large-context and cross-agent coordination layer

    Not sure which to pick?

    🎯 Take our quiz →
    🦞

    New to AI tools?

    Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

    Read Guides →
    🔔

    Price Drop Alerts

    Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

    Tracking 2 tools

    We only email when prices actually change. No spam, ever.

    Get weekly AI agent tool insights

    Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

    No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

    Ready to Choose?

    Read the full reviews to make an informed decision

    Review Kilo CodeReview Augment Code