Helicone vs Langfuse

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

Helicone

🔴Developer

AI observability

open-source LLM observability and gateway platform

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Free

Langfuse

🔴Developer

Open-source LLM observability

open-source LLM observability, tracing, prompt and eval platform

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Free

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

FeatureHeliconeLangfuse
CategoryAI observabilityOpen-source LLM observability
Pricing Plans4 tiers38 tiers
Starting PriceFreeFree
Key Features
  • Proxy-Based Request Logging
  • Cost Analytics & Budget Alerts
  • Gateway-Level Caching
  • Hierarchical Tracing & Agent Debugging
  • Production Prompt Management & Versioning
  • LLM-as-Judge Evaluation Framework

💡 Our Take

Choose Helicone if your priority is cost analytics, caching, and rate limiting with a 5-minute proxy setup that requires no SDK installation. Choose Langfuse if you need deep multi-step agent tracing, prompt management, and evaluation workflows with parent-child span hierarchies. Many teams use both — Helicone at the gateway for cost controls, Langfuse via SDK for tracing depth.

Helicone - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Open-source positioning and one-line integration reduce adoption friction
  • Pricing is more transparent than many LLM observability tools
  • Combines observability and gateway controls in one product

Cons

  • Hobby plan limits retention to 7 days and ingestion to 10 logs/min
  • Advanced compliance and Slack support start at the $799/month Team tier
  • Teams needing deep eval workflows may still compare against Braintrust or Langfuse

Langfuse - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Open-source and self-hostable, which is valuable for teams that do not want observability locked fully in a SaaS.
  • Clear fit for prompt lifecycle management: versioning, fetching, traces, datasets, and evals in one workflow.
  • MCP support is useful for coding agents that need to inspect or update observability assets safely.
  • Cloud pricing starts low enough for serious prototypes while still offering enterprise controls.

Cons

  • Unit-based pricing requires teams to understand how traces and observations translate into monthly spend.
  • Self-hosting reduces vendor lock-in but adds ClickHouse/database operations and upgrade responsibility.
  • Not a full application monitoring suite; you still need product analytics and infrastructure observability.

Not sure which to pick?

🎯 Take our quiz →

🔒 Security & Compliance Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

Security FeatureHeliconeLangfuse
SOC2✅ Yes✅ Yes
GDPR✅ Yes✅ Yes
HIPAA❌ No✅ Yes
SSO✅ Yes✅ Yes
Self-Hosted✅ Yes
On-Prem✅ Yes✅ Yes
RBAC✅ Yes✅ Yes
Audit Log✅ Yes✅ Yes
Open Source✅ Yes✅ Yes
API Key Auth✅ Yes✅ Yes
Encryption at Rest✅ Yes✅ Yes
Encryption in Transit✅ Yes✅ Yes
Data ResidencyUS, EUUS, EU, SELF-HOSTED
Data Retentionconfigurableconfigurable
🦞

New to AI tools?

Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

🔔

Price Drop Alerts

Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

Tracking 2 tools

We only email when prices actually change. No spam, ever.

Get weekly AI agent tool insights

Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ready to Choose?

Read the full reviews to make an informed decision