Fillo vs Decision Node

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

Fillo

🔴Developer

Developer Tools

Fillo lets coding agents add native, product-embedded forms while Fillo manages validation, uploads, submissions, versions, and delivery.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Custom
Full ReviewVisit Site

Decision Node

🔴Developer

Developer Tools

MCP server that records development decisions as structured JSON, embeds them as vectors, and enables semantic search over past decisions.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Custom
Full ReviewVisit Site

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

FeatureFilloDecision Node
CategoryDeveloper ToolsDeveloper Tools
Pricing Plans50 tiers315 tiers
Starting Price
Key Features
  • • Native React and framework-agnostic rendering without an iframe
  • • Visual-builder and code-defined forms with headless composition
  • • Conditional logic, multi-page flows, prefill, and respondent verification
  • • MCP server for AI coding tools
  • • Structured JSON decision records
  • • Semantic decision search

Fillo - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • ✓Free includes the full SDK and core product features.
  • ✓Native rendering preserves product CSS and design-system control.
  • ✓Managed uploads, webhooks, response history, and integrations reduce backend work.
  • ✓Published EU hosting and security documentation help vendor review.

Cons

  • ✗Free is limited to 200 completed responses per month.
  • ✗Paid overage charges make busy public forms more expensive.
  • ✗The platform adds a vendor dependency to a critical submission path.
  • ✗No native MCP server or client support was verified.

Decision Node - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • ✓Semantic search finds relevant decisions even with different terminology
  • ✓Works across all major AI coding tools via MCP
  • ✓Local storage keeps sensitive decisions on-premises
  • ✓Visual UI helps teams explore decision relationships
  • ✓Structured format prevents decisions from becoming unstructured brain dumps

Cons

  • ✗Requires a Gemini API key for vector embeddings (adds dependency and cost)
  • ✗Only useful if the team consistently records decisions — needs adoption discipline
  • ✗Local-only storage means no built-in team sync or cloud collaboration
  • ✗Vector embeddings are Gemini-specific — no choice of embedding provider
  • ✗No integration with existing decision documentation tools (ADR tools, Notion, etc.)

Not sure which to pick?

🎯 Take our quiz →
🦞

New to AI tools?

Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

Read Guides →
🔔

Price Drop Alerts

Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

Tracking 2 tools

We only email when prices actually change. No spam, ever.

Get weekly AI agent tool insights

Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ready to Choose?

Read the full reviews to make an informed decision

Review FilloReview Decision Node