Fillo vs Continue

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

Fillo

🔴Developer

Developer Tools

Fillo lets coding agents add native, product-embedded forms while Fillo manages validation, uploads, submissions, versions, and delivery.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

€0/month
Full ReviewVisit Site

Continue

🔴Developer

Developer Tools

Open-source AI coding assistant for VS Code and JetBrains — bring any model, any MCP server, and share reusable rules and agents across your team via Continue Hub.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Free
Full ReviewVisit Site

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

FeatureFilloContinue
CategoryDeveloper ToolsDeveloper Tools
Pricing Plans2 listed plans4 listed plans
Starting Price€0/monthFree
Key Features
  • • Native React and framework-agnostic rendering without an iframe
  • • Visual-builder and code-defined forms with headless composition
  • • Conditional logic, multi-page flows, prefill, and respondent verification
  • • Multi-model AI support including OpenAI, Claude, Gemini, and local models
  • • Native IDE extensions for VS Code and JetBrains with smooth workflow integration
  • • MCP server connectivity for development toolchain integration

Fillo - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • ✓Free includes the full SDK and core product features.
  • ✓Native rendering preserves product CSS and design-system control.
  • ✓Managed uploads, webhooks, response history, and integrations reduce backend work.
  • ✓Published EU hosting and security documentation help vendor review.

Cons

  • ✗Free is limited to 200 completed responses per month.
  • ✗Paid overage charges make busy public forms more expensive.
  • ✗The platform adds a vendor dependency to a critical submission path.
  • ✗No native MCP server or client support was verified.

Continue - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • ✓Open-source assistant for VS Code and JetBrains. This directly supports the primary workflow.
  • ✓Bring-your-own-model: Anthropic, OpenAI, Ollama, local, any provider.
  • ✓First-class MCP client — any MCP server becomes callable tools.
  • ✓Continue Hub for sharing assistants, rules, prompts across a team.

Cons

  • ✗At least one tier requires a sales quote, preventing a complete public budget calculation.
  • ✗Features and limits can change by plan, billing interval, region, and release; verify current documentation.
  • ✗MCP connectivity expands the permission surface and requires narrow scopes, approvals, logs, and credential rotation.
  • ✗A representative pilot is necessary because a feature list does not establish reliability or operational fit.

Not sure which to pick?

🎯 Take our quiz →
🦞

New to AI tools?

Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

Read Guides →
🔔

Price Drop Alerts

Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

Tracking 2 tools

We only email when prices actually change. No spam, ever.

Get weekly AI agent tool insights

Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ready to Choose?

Read the full reviews to make an informed decision

Review FilloReview Continue