Figma Make vs Adobe After Effects

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

Figma Make

AI Development Assistants

Figma's native generative AI design tool that turns natural-language prompts into editable UI designs, prototypes, and layouts directly inside the Figma canvas — no external plugins or exports required.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Custom
Full ReviewVisit Site

Adobe After Effects

AI Development Assistants

Professional motion graphics and visual effects software with new high-performance preview playback engine and enhanced 3D motion design tools.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Custom
Full ReviewVisit Site

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

FeatureFigma MakeAdobe After Effects
CategoryAI Development AssistantsAI Development Assistants
Pricing Plans8 tiers4 tiers
Starting Price
Key Features
  • • Natural-language prompt-to-UI generation
  • • Full-page and component-level design creation
  • • Design system–aware output (tokens, variables, components)
  • • Motion Graphics & Animation: Layer-based timeline with advanced keyframing, graph editor, and puppet tools for character animation. Supports shape layers, text animators, and Motion Graphics Templates (.mogrt).
  • • Visual Effects & Compositing: Over 250 built-in effects including keying, tracking, stabilization, and particle systems. Supports 3D camera tracking, planar tracking via Mocha AE, and content-aware fill for video.
  • • 3D Motion Design: Native 3D model import (.glTF, .OBJ) with real-time ray-traced rendering via the Mercury 3D engine. Includes 3D layers, cameras, and lights without requiring third-party plugins.

Figma Make - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • ✓Native Figma integration produces fully editable vector layers, auto-layout frames, and real component instances — not flattened images requiring reconstruction
  • ✓Automatically applies your team's existing design system tokens, variables, and published component libraries to generated outputs, dramatically reducing on-brand cleanup time
  • ✓Supabase integration (added in 2025) lets users ship functional web apps with authentication, data storage, and private APIs directly from a prompt — no coding required
  • ✓Iterative conversational refinement converges on a desired layout in 2–3 prompts rather than full regeneration cycles required by most competitors
  • ✓Seamless handoff to developers via Figma's Dev Mode, preserving accurate CSS specs, spacing values, and exportable assets for engineering teams
  • ✓Available across all Figma plan tiers — from free Starter to $75/editor/month Enterprise — making it accessible to Figma's 4M+ existing users without a separate subscription

Cons

  • ✗Generation quality depends heavily on prompt specificity; vague prompts produce generic or off-brand layouts that require manual rework
  • ✗AI generation quotas on lower-tier plans (Starter and Professional at $12–$15/editor/month) can feel restrictive for teams running heavy ideation sprints
  • ✗Outputs are locked into the Figma ecosystem — there is no native export to Sketch, Adobe XD, or Penpot without third-party conversion tools
  • ✗Highly custom or illustrative styles (3D elements, complex illustrations, non-standard layouts) are not well-supported; Make is optimized for standard UI patterns
  • ✗Design system adherence can degrade with poorly structured or undocumented component libraries, requiring manual component swaps after generation

Adobe After Effects - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • ✓Industry-standard tool with the largest ecosystem of third-party plugins, scripts, presets, and templates—aescripts.com alone hosts over 1,500 tools
  • ✓Deep integration with Premiere Pro via Dynamic Link and the broader Creative Cloud suite preserves layers and metadata across applications
  • ✓Powerful expression engine based on JavaScript allows procedural animation and automation that significantly reduces manual keyframing
  • ✓Extensive learning resources including Adobe's own tutorials, School of Motion courses, and a massive community of creators sharing techniques
  • ✓Regular updates with AI-powered features like Roto Brush 3.0 and content-aware fill that accelerate traditionally tedious VFX tasks
  • ✓Supports 32-bit color depth and compositions up to 30,000x30,000 pixels, making it suitable for HDR, film, and large-format output

Cons

  • ✗Steep learning curve with a complex interface that can take months to become proficient in, especially for users new to compositing concepts
  • ✗High system requirements—Adobe recommends 32 GB RAM minimum and a dedicated GPU; complex projects can consume 64 GB+ RAM easily
  • ✗No perpetual license available; subscription-only model means ongoing costs even for infrequent users, with cancellation fees on annual plans
  • ✗Frame-by-frame rendering architecture means no real-time playback for complex compositions without pre-rendering, unlike node-based tools like Fusion
  • ✗Single-threaded for many operations despite multi-frame rendering improvements, leading to slow render times on CPU-heavy effects
  • ✗Not designed for long-form editing or real-time 3D; users working primarily in those areas will need additional tools like Cinema 4D or Premiere Pro

Not sure which to pick?

🎯 Take our quiz →
🦞

New to AI tools?

Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

Read Guides →
🔔

Price Drop Alerts

Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

Tracking 2 tools

We only email when prices actually change. No spam, ever.

Get weekly AI agent tool insights

Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ready to Choose?

Read the full reviews to make an informed decision

Review Figma MakeReview Adobe After Effects