THE COMPARISON / A CLOSER LOOK

Devin vs Cursor

Compare the listed plans, useful capabilities, and practical tradeoffs.

Prices and features reflect editorial records. Check vendor terms before you buy; documentary checks do not imply hands-on testing.

Devin

🔴Developer

AI software engineer

Devin review for engineering teams: AI software engineer features, pricing, MCP integrations, enterprise controls, pros, cons, and use cases.

SOURCE-CHECK COVERAGE

No scoped source-check record shown. Check current pricing and vendor terms before buying.

Starting Price

$500/mo

Cursor

🔴Developer

AI coding assistants

Cursor is an AI-focused code editor that helps teams edit, explain, and navigate software projects with an AI assistant.

SOURCE-CHECK COVERAGE

No scoped source-check record shown. Check current pricing and vendor terms before buying.

Starting Price

Hobby: $0; Pro: $20/month; Pro+: $60/month; Ultra: $200/month; Teams: $40/user/month; Enterprise: Custom

Feature Comparison

Focus the table and use arrow keys to scroll when columns extend beyond the screen.

FeatureDevinCursor
CategoryAI software engineerAI coding assistants
Pricing Plans5 listed plansPlan details unavailable
Starting Price$500/moHobby: $0; Pro: $20/month; Pro+: $60/month; Ultra: $200/month; Teams: $40/user/month; Enterprise: Custom
Key Features
  • • Cloud AI software engineering agent
  • • Plans, codes, tests, and opens pull requests
  • • Parallel task execution for migrations and refactors
  • • AI code editor with agent requests and Tab completions
  • • Cloud agents plus terminal, Slack, and GitHub workflows
  • • MCPs, skills, hooks, and frontier model access on paid plans

Devin - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • ✓Targets end-to-end engineering tasks, not just autocomplete
  • ✓Published case study includes concrete 8x time efficiency and 20x cost-savings claims
  • ✓Integrates with engineering workflows such as Slack, Linear, and MCP
  • ✓Useful for repetitive migrations and well-scoped backlog work

Cons

  • ✗Needs strong review culture; autonomous code still requires human accountability
  • ✗Costs can rise for heavy usage or larger teams
  • ✗Best results depend on tests, clear tickets, and accessible repo context
  • ✗Enterprise deployment and security features require custom sales process

Cursor - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • ✓Keeps AI assistance close to code, diagnostics, and diffs
  • ✓Repository context is more useful than pasting isolated snippets into chat
  • ✓MCP support extends the agent with external tools
  • ✓Strong fit for feature work, refactors, and codebase onboarding

Cons

  • ✗Generated multi-file changes still require careful review and tests
  • ✗Large repositories can exceed practical context limits
  • ✗Teams must assess source-code privacy and tool permissions
  • ✗Pricing and current plan limits aren't published; check the vendor's site for current plans

Not sure which to pick?

🎯 Take our quiz →

🔒 Security & Compliance Comparison

Focus the table and use arrow keys to scroll when columns extend beyond the screen.

Security FeatureDevinCursor
SOC2✅ Yes—
GDPR——
HIPAA——
SSO✅ Yes—
Self-Hosted❌ No—
On-Prem❌ No—
RBAC✅ Yes—
Audit Log——
Open Source❌ No—
API Key Auth✅ Yes—
Encryption at Rest✅ Yes—
Encryption in Transit✅ Yes—
Data Residency——
Data Retention——
🦞

New to AI tools?

Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

🔔

Price Alert Interest

Record the tools you want pricing updates for

Selected 2 tools

Registration records your interest; an alert schedule and email delivery are not confirmed.

Get weekly AI agent tool insights

Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ready to Choose?

Read the full reviews to make an informed decision