Devin vs Continue

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

Devin

🔴Developer

AI Coding

Devin is an autonomous AI software engineer from Cognition that plans, writes, and ships code from a single prompt, running long-horizon engineering work in a cloud sandbox.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

$500/mo

Continue

🔴Developer

AI Coding

Open-source AI code assistant for VS Code and JetBrains with a hub for custom assistants, MCP tools, prompts, and rules — the go-to when a team wants a Copilot-shaped experience they fully control.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Custom

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

FeatureDevinContinue
CategoryAI CodingAI Coding
Pricing Plans122 tiers187 tiers
Starting Price$500/mo
Key Features
  • Cloud AI software engineering agent
  • Plans, codes, tests, and opens pull requests
  • Parallel task execution for migrations and refactors
  • Open-source AI assistant for configurable developer workflows
  • Source-controlled AI checks on every pull request
  • Custom team standards that can be reviewed like code

Devin - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Genuine autonomy: plans, codes, runs, and tests without constant prompting
  • Parallel cloud agents let one engineer drive several tickets at once
  • Devin Desktop (Windsurf) bundle gives you an IDE and the autonomous agent on one plan
  • Pro tier at $20/month is competitive with single-seat Copilot/Cursor pricing
  • Live session review preserves human-in-the-loop oversight

Cons

  • Best on repos with strong test suites; weaker when feedback signals are missing
  • Long-horizon tasks can burn quota quickly; Max tier exists for a reason
  • Cloud sandbox means sensitive monorepos need careful access review
  • Quality varies on greenfield or product-judgment-heavy work
  • Teams plan adds $40/seat on top of base, which scales fast for large squads

Continue - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Supports chat, autocomplete, edits, and agents in VS Code and JetBrains
  • Works with hosted, self-hosted, and local model providers
  • Versioned assistants package models, rules, docs, prompts, and tools
  • Apache 2.0 licensing gives teams meaningful control over deployment

Cons

  • Model and embedding configuration can be more work than a bundled assistant
  • Local models require capable hardware and careful quality testing
  • Team-tier prices and exact entitlements were not independently verified
  • A broad provider matrix can create inconsistent experiences across developers

Not sure which to pick?

🎯 Take our quiz →

🔒 Security & Compliance Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

Security FeatureDevinContinue
SOC2✅ Yes
GDPR
HIPAA
SSO✅ Yes
Self-Hosted❌ No
On-Prem❌ No
RBAC✅ Yes
Audit Log
Open Source❌ No
API Key Auth✅ Yes
Encryption at Rest✅ Yes
Encryption in Transit✅ Yes
Data Residency
Data Retention
🦞

New to AI tools?

Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

🔔

Price Drop Alerts

Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

Tracking 2 tools

We only email when prices actually change. No spam, ever.

Get weekly AI agent tool insights

Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ready to Choose?

Read the full reviews to make an informed decision