Cursor vs Devin

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

Cursor

🔴Developer

AI coding assistants

Cursor is an AI-focused code editor that helps teams edit, explain, and navigate software projects with an AI assistant.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Custom

Devin

🔴Developer

AI Coding

Devin is an autonomous AI software engineer from Cognition that plans, writes, and ships code from a single prompt, running long-horizon engineering work in a cloud sandbox.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

$500/mo

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

FeatureCursorDevin
CategoryAI coding assistantsAI Coding
Pricing Plans192 tiers122 tiers
Starting Price$500/mo
Key Features
  • AI code editor with agent requests and Tab completions
  • Cloud agents plus terminal, Slack, and GitHub workflows
  • MCPs, skills, hooks, and frontier model access on paid plans
  • Cloud AI software engineering agent
  • Plans, codes, tests, and opens pull requests
  • Parallel task execution for migrations and refactors

Cursor - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Keeps AI assistance close to code, diagnostics, and diffs
  • Repository context is more useful than pasting isolated snippets into chat
  • MCP support extends the agent with external tools
  • Strong fit for feature work, refactors, and codebase onboarding

Cons

  • Generated multi-file changes still require careful review and tests
  • Large repositories can exceed practical context limits
  • Teams must assess source-code privacy and tool permissions
  • Pricing and current plan limits were not verifiable in this run

Devin - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Genuine autonomy: plans, codes, runs, and tests without constant prompting
  • Parallel cloud agents let one engineer drive several tickets at once
  • Devin Desktop (Windsurf) bundle gives you an IDE and the autonomous agent on one plan
  • Pro tier at $20/month is competitive with single-seat Copilot/Cursor pricing
  • Live session review preserves human-in-the-loop oversight

Cons

  • Best on repos with strong test suites; weaker when feedback signals are missing
  • Long-horizon tasks can burn quota quickly; Max tier exists for a reason
  • Cloud sandbox means sensitive monorepos need careful access review
  • Quality varies on greenfield or product-judgment-heavy work
  • Teams plan adds $40/seat on top of base, which scales fast for large squads

Not sure which to pick?

🎯 Take our quiz →

🔒 Security & Compliance Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

Security FeatureCursorDevin
SOC2✅ Yes
GDPR
HIPAA
SSO✅ Yes
Self-Hosted❌ No
On-Prem❌ No
RBAC✅ Yes
Audit Log
Open Source❌ No
API Key Auth✅ Yes
Encryption at Rest✅ Yes
Encryption in Transit✅ Yes
Data Residency
Data Retention
🦞

New to AI tools?

Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

🔔

Price Drop Alerts

Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

Tracking 2 tools

We only email when prices actually change. No spam, ever.

Get weekly AI agent tool insights

Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ready to Choose?

Read the full reviews to make an informed decision