THE COMPARISON / A CLOSER LOOK
Cursor (Agent Mode) vs Devin
Compare the listed plans, useful capabilities, and practical tradeoffs.
Prices and features reflect editorial records. Check vendor terms before you buy; documentary checks do not imply hands-on testing.
Cursor (Agent Mode)
🔴DeveloperAI Development Assistants
Cursor is the leading AI-first code editor: a VS Code fork with Tab autocomplete, Chat, and — most importantly — Agent mode that reads your whole repo, edits…
SOURCE-CHECK COVERAGE
No scoped source-check record shown. Check current pricing and vendor terms before buying.
Starting Price
FreeDevin
🔴DeveloperAI software engineer
Devin review for engineering teams: AI software engineer features, pricing, MCP integrations, enterprise controls, pros, cons, and use cases.
SOURCE-CHECK COVERAGE
No scoped source-check record shown. Check current pricing and vendor terms before buying.
Starting Price
$500/moFeature Comparison
Focus the table and use arrow keys to scroll when columns extend beyond the screen.
Cursor (Agent Mode) - Pros & Cons
Pros
- ✓Best-in-class Tab autocomplete — genuinely feels a step ahead of your typing
- ✓Agent Mode handles real multi-file tasks and long-horizon changes with test loops
- ✓Full VS Code compatibility means zero switching cost for most developers
- ✓Pricing scales up cleanly for agent-heavy usage (Pro+, Ultra) without leaving the tool
Cons
- ✗Ultra at $200/mo is a large ask; agent workflows can also burn Pro fast requests quickly
- ✗Fast-request rate limits can bite during long agent sessions on the lower tiers
- ✗Not open source — you're locked to Anysphere's roadmap and pricing changes
- ✗Team admin/analytics are still lighter than Copilot Business for large orgs
Devin - Pros & Cons
Pros
- ✓Targets end-to-end engineering tasks, not just autocomplete
- ✓Published case study includes concrete 8x time efficiency and 20x cost-savings claims
- ✓Integrates with engineering workflows such as Slack, Linear, and MCP
- ✓Useful for repetitive migrations and well-scoped backlog work
Cons
- ✗Needs strong review culture; autonomous code still requires human accountability
- ✗Costs can rise for heavy usage or larger teams
- ✗Best results depend on tests, clear tickets, and accessible repo context
- ✗Enterprise deployment and security features require custom sales process
Not sure which to pick?
🎯 Take our quiz →🔒 Security & Compliance Comparison
Focus the table and use arrow keys to scroll when columns extend beyond the screen.
Price Alert Interest
Record the tools you want pricing updates for
Ready to Choose?
Read the full reviews to make an informed decision