Cody by Sourcegraph vs Devin

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

Cody by Sourcegraph

🔴Developer

AI Development Assistants

Cody is Sourcegraph's AI coding assistant that uses the Sourcegraph code graph for repo-wide context, ships across VS Code/JetBrains/CLI, and is priced from $0 Free to $16/user/month Pro and Enterprise custom.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Free

Devin

🔴Developer

Autonomous coding agent

An autonomous software engineering agent designed to take assigned development work from plan through implementation.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

$500/mo

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

FeatureCody by SourcegraphDevin
CategoryAI Development AssistantsAutonomous coding agent
Pricing Plans8 tiers154 tiers
Starting PriceFree$500/mo
Key Features
  • • AI-powered code completion with codebase context
  • • Natural language chat for code Q&A and generation
  • • Auto-edit suggestions based on cursor and editing patterns
  • • Cloud AI software engineering agent
  • • Plans, codes, tests, and opens pull requests
  • • Parallel task execution for migrations and refactors

Cody by Sourcegraph - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • ✓Deep codebase context via Sourcegraph's Code Search API, pulling relevant symbols and usage patterns across entire codebases for more accurate suggestions
  • ✓Multi-LLM support lets users choose between Claude, GPT-4o, Gemini and other models, and enterprise customers can bring their own keys
  • ✓Wide IDE coverage including VS Code, JetBrains, Visual Studio (experimental), a web interface in the Sourcegraph platform, and CLI access
  • ✓Strong fit for large monorepos and polyrepo enterprise environments where cross-repository context is critical for accurate AI assistance
  • ✓Customizable prompts and commands let teams encode standardized workflows (test generation, code review checklists, documentation) as reusable templates
  • ✓Enterprise-grade governance with SSO, audit logs, repo permission-aware context, and guardrails for compliance-sensitive industries

Cons

  • ✗Full enterprise context features require deploying and configuring Sourcegraph's code intelligence platform, which adds operational overhead
  • ✗Free tier usage limits are more restrictive than some competitors like GitHub Copilot's free offering
  • ✗Maximum value requires proper codebase indexing setup — context quality scales with indexing completeness
  • ✗Smaller extension marketplace compared to GitHub Copilot's broader third-party integration ecosystem
  • ✗Amp (the agentic evolution) is a separate product requiring additional onboarding and different workflows from the core Cody experience
  • ✗Enterprise deployment complexity can be significant for smaller teams without dedicated DevOps resources
  • ✗Learning curve to leverage advanced features like custom prompts, context filters, and @-mentions effectively

Devin - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • ✓Handles work beyond a single completion
  • ✓Produces changes suited to pull-request review
  • ✓Useful for repetitive maintenance and parallel backlog work

Cons

  • ✗Current pricing was not verifiable in static HTML
  • ✗Ambiguous requirements can cause expensive rework
  • ✗Broad repository and MCP access needs governance

Not sure which to pick?

🎯 Take our quiz →

🔒 Security & Compliance Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

Security FeatureCody by SourcegraphDevin
SOC2—✅ Yes
GDPR——
HIPAA——
SSO—✅ Yes
Self-Hosted—❌ No
On-Prem—❌ No
RBAC—✅ Yes
Audit Log——
Open Source—❌ No
API Key Auth—✅ Yes
Encryption at Rest—✅ Yes
Encryption in Transit—✅ Yes
Data Residency——
Data Retention——
🦞

New to AI tools?

Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

🔔

Price Drop Alerts

Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

Tracking 2 tools

We only email when prices actually change. No spam, ever.

Get weekly AI agent tool insights

Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ready to Choose?

Read the full reviews to make an informed decision