Cody by Sourcegraph vs Devin

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

Cody by Sourcegraph

🔴Developer

AI Development Assistants

AI coding assistant powered by Sourcegraph's code intelligence platform, providing full codebase context awareness across repositories for chat, code completion, and agentic coding workflows.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Free

Devin

🟡Low Code

AI Development Assistants

AI software engineer that codes, fixes bugs, and ships features autonomously. Builds full applications end-to-end with minimal supervision.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

$500/mo

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

FeatureCody by SourcegraphDevin
CategoryAI Development AssistantsAI Development Assistants
Pricing Plans8 tiers4 tiers
Starting PriceFree$500/mo
Key Features
  • AI-powered code completion with codebase context
  • Natural language chat for code Q&A and generation
  • Auto-edit suggestions based on cursor and editing patterns

    Cody by Sourcegraph - Pros & Cons

    Pros

    • Deep codebase context via Sourcegraph's Code Search API, pulling relevant symbols and usage patterns across entire codebases for more accurate suggestions
    • Multi-LLM support lets users choose between Claude, GPT-4o, Gemini and other models, and enterprise customers can bring their own keys
    • Wide IDE coverage including VS Code, JetBrains, Visual Studio (experimental), a web interface in the Sourcegraph platform, and CLI access
    • Strong fit for large monorepos and polyrepo enterprise environments where cross-repository context is critical for accurate AI assistance
    • Customizable prompts and commands let teams encode standardized workflows (test generation, code review checklists, documentation) as reusable templates
    • Enterprise-grade governance with SSO, audit logs, repo permission-aware context, and guardrails for compliance-sensitive industries

    Cons

    • Full enterprise context features require deploying and configuring Sourcegraph's code intelligence platform, which adds operational overhead
    • Free tier usage limits are more restrictive than some competitors like GitHub Copilot's free offering
    • Maximum value requires proper codebase indexing setup — context quality scales with indexing completeness
    • Smaller extension marketplace compared to GitHub Copilot's broader third-party integration ecosystem
    • Amp (the agentic evolution) is a separate product requiring additional onboarding and different workflows from the core Cody experience
    • Enterprise deployment complexity can be significant for smaller teams without dedicated DevOps resources
    • Learning curve to leverage advanced features like custom prompts, context filters, and @-mentions effectively

    Devin - Pros & Cons

    Pros

    • Operates fully autonomously in a sandboxed VM with shell, browser, and editor access — handles end-to-end tasks that pair-programming tools cannot
    • Integrates directly into existing engineering workflows via Slack, GitHub, Linear, and Jira, so tickets can be assigned to Devin like a human teammate
    • Sessions are observable and interruptible — you can watch its plan, give mid-run feedback, edit files, or rewind to a checkpoint
    • Strong fit for parallelizable backlog work: small bug fixes, test writing, dependency upgrades, and codebase migrations across many files
    • Enterprise-ready with SOC 2 compliance, VPC/self-hosted deployment options, and a Devin API for programmatic dispatch from CI or internal tools
    • Maintains a custom knowledge base of repo conventions, runbooks, and prior decisions so it improves at your codebase over time

    Cons

    • Significantly more expensive than IDE-based copilots, with usage-based ACU pricing that can escalate quickly on long or complex tasks
    • Quality drops sharply on ambiguous, novel, or architecturally complex work — best results require well-scoped tickets and good documentation
    • Async cloud-VM model means iteration latency is much slower than an inline assistant like Cursor or Copilot for quick edits
    • Requires real human review on every PR — unsupervised merging is risky, so it adds review load even as it removes implementation load
    • Onboarding to a new codebase takes time and tuning of the knowledge base before output quality becomes consistently useful

    Not sure which to pick?

    🎯 Take our quiz →

    🔒 Security & Compliance Comparison

    Scroll horizontally to compare details.

    Security FeatureCody by SourcegraphDevin
    SOC2✅ Yes
    GDPR
    HIPAA
    SSO✅ Yes
    Self-Hosted❌ No
    On-Prem❌ No
    RBAC✅ Yes
    Audit Log
    Open Source❌ No
    API Key Auth✅ Yes
    Encryption at Rest✅ Yes
    Encryption in Transit✅ Yes
    Data Residency
    Data Retention
    🦞

    New to AI tools?

    Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

    🔔

    Price Drop Alerts

    Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

    Tracking 2 tools

    We only email when prices actually change. No spam, ever.

    Get weekly AI agent tool insights

    Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

    No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

    Ready to Choose?

    Read the full reviews to make an informed decision