Cody by Sourcegraph vs Continue
Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool
Cody by Sourcegraph
🔴DeveloperAI Development Assistants
Cody is Sourcegraph's AI coding assistant that uses the Sourcegraph code graph for repo-wide context, ships across VS Code/JetBrains/CLI, and is priced from $0 Free to $16/user/month Pro and Enterprise custom.
Was this helpful?
Starting Price
FreeContinue
🔴DeveloperAI Coding Assistant
Open-source AI code assistant for VS Code and JetBrains — bring your own models, curate a shared block library, ship as an internal platform.
Was this helpful?
Starting Price
CustomFeature Comparison
Scroll horizontally to compare details.
Cody by Sourcegraph - Pros & Cons
Pros
- ✓Deep codebase context via Sourcegraph's Code Search API, pulling relevant symbols and usage patterns across entire codebases for more accurate suggestions
- ✓Multi-LLM support lets users choose between Claude, GPT-4o, Gemini and other models, and enterprise customers can bring their own keys
- ✓Wide IDE coverage including VS Code, JetBrains, Visual Studio (experimental), a web interface in the Sourcegraph platform, and CLI access
- ✓Strong fit for large monorepos and polyrepo enterprise environments where cross-repository context is critical for accurate AI assistance
- ✓Customizable prompts and commands let teams encode standardized workflows (test generation, code review checklists, documentation) as reusable templates
- ✓Enterprise-grade governance with SSO, audit logs, repo permission-aware context, and guardrails for compliance-sensitive industries
Cons
- ✗Full enterprise context features require deploying and configuring Sourcegraph's code intelligence platform, which adds operational overhead
- ✗Free tier usage limits are more restrictive than some competitors like GitHub Copilot's free offering
- ✗Maximum value requires proper codebase indexing setup — context quality scales with indexing completeness
- ✗Smaller extension marketplace compared to GitHub Copilot's broader third-party integration ecosystem
- ✗Amp (the agentic evolution) is a separate product requiring additional onboarding and different workflows from the core Cody experience
- ✗Enterprise deployment complexity can be significant for smaller teams without dedicated DevOps resources
- ✗Learning curve to leverage advanced features like custom prompts, context filters, and @-mentions effectively
Continue - Pros & Cons
Pros
- ✓Truly BYOK across 15+ providers — nothing is hard-wired to a single vendor
- ✓Apache 2.0 core makes procurement trivial for regulated enterprises
- ✓Continue Hub lets platform teams ship a standard assistant to every developer
- ✓First-class MCP client so team MCP servers become instantly reusable
- ✓Works in both VS Code and JetBrains — one config across polyglot teams
Cons
- ✗You are responsible for choosing and paying providers — no all-in-one price
- ✗Autocomplete quality depends heavily on which model you route to
- ✗Agent mode is competent but less aggressive than Cursor Composer or Cascade
- ✗Hub adoption still evolving; block ecosystem smaller than closed marketplaces
- ✗Teams tier pricing is not published — expect a sales conversation for real orgs
Not sure which to pick?
🎯 Take our quiz →Price Drop Alerts
Get notified when AI tools lower their prices
Get weekly AI agent tool insights
Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.
Ready to Choose?
Read the full reviews to make an informed decision