THE COMPARISON / A CLOSER LOOK
Codeium (Devin Desktop) vs OpenDevin
Compare the listed plans, useful capabilities, and practical tradeoffs.
Prices and features reflect editorial records. Check vendor terms before you buy; documentary checks do not imply hands-on testing.
Codeium (Devin Desktop)
🟡Low CodeAI Development Platforms
Codeium has rebranded to Devin Desktop under Cognition — an IDE plus coding-agent command center with Free, Pro $20, Max $200, and Team plans.
SOURCE-CHECK COVERAGE
No scoped source-check record shown. Check current pricing and vendor terms before buying.
Starting Price
$0OpenDevin
🔴DeveloperAI Development Assistants
Autonomous AI software engineer that generates code, debugs applications, and automates complex development workflows in sandboxed environments.
SOURCE-CHECK COVERAGE
No scoped source-check record shown. Check current pricing and vendor terms before buying.
Starting Price
FreeFeature Comparison
Focus the table and use arrow keys to scroll when columns extend beyond the screen.
Codeium (Devin Desktop) - Pros & Cons
Pros
- ✓Bundles a real IDE, frontier model access, and Devin Cloud agents at $20/month — competitive with Cursor
- ✓SWE 1.6 (Cognition's own coding model) is free on Pro+ and is improving fast as a first-party model
- ✓Agent Client Protocol and parallel session management are genuinely useful for multi-agent workflows
Cons
- ✗Rebrand from Codeium / Windsurf to Devin Desktop has created naming confusion across docs and tutorials
- ✗Free plan is now meaningfully more limited than the original Codeium free-forever autocomplete
- ✗$200/mo Max plan matches Cursor Ultra without a clear quality advantage on frontier model output
OpenDevin - Pros & Cons
Pros
- ✓Open-source core under the MIT license, including the main openhands and agent-server Docker images, which makes the agent stack inspectable and self-hostable for technical teams.
- ✓Multiple product surfaces are available from the same project: Python SDK, CLI, local GUI with REST API, hosted cloud deployment, and enterprise self-hosted deployment.
- ✓The CLI can be powered by Claude, GPT, or other LLMs, giving teams flexibility instead of locking them into one model provider.
- ✓The SDK is designed for developers who want to define agents in code and run them locally or scale them to large numbers of agents in the cloud.
- ✓OpenHands Cloud includes team-oriented features such as Slack, Jira, Linear integrations, multi-user support, RBAC, permissions, and conversation sharing.
- ✓Public repository activity, release history, stars, forks, and contributor counts can be inspected directly on GitHub and should be checked there because those metrics change frequently.
Cons
- ✗The original OpenDevin branding has moved to OpenHands, which can create confusion when searching for documentation, releases, or current product information.
- ✗Enterprise functionality is source-available but not fully MIT-licensed; running the enterprise directory beyond one month requires purchasing a license.
- ✗The tool depends on external or configured LLMs such as Claude, GPT, or other models, so real operating cost and output quality vary by provider and model choice.
- ✗Autonomous coding agents still require careful human review before code is merged, especially when they modify application logic, dependencies, tests, or infrastructure.
- ✗Self-hosting the enterprise cloud deployment requires Kubernetes and private infrastructure experience, which may be excessive for smaller teams.
Not sure which to pick?
🎯 Take our quiz →Price Alert Interest
Record the tools you want pricing updates for
Ready to Choose?
Read the full reviews to make an informed decision