Codeium (Devin Desktop) vs Continue

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

Codeium (Devin Desktop)

🟡Low Code

AI Development Platforms

Codeium has rebranded to Devin Desktop under Cognition — an IDE plus coding-agent command center with Free, Pro $20, Max $200, and Team plans.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Custom

Continue

🔴Developer

AI Coding Assistant

Open-source AI code assistant for VS Code and JetBrains — bring your own models, curate a shared block library, ship as an internal platform.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Custom

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

FeatureCodeium (Devin Desktop)Continue
CategoryAI Development PlatformsAI Coding Assistant
Pricing Plans8 tiers36 tiers
Starting Price
Key Features
    • Multi-model AI support including OpenAI, Claude, Gemini, and local models
    • Native IDE extensions for VS Code and JetBrains with smooth workflow integration
    • MCP server connectivity for development toolchain integration

    💡 Our Take

    Choose Continue.dev if you want open-source code, source-controlled PR checks, and the freedom to swap model providers. Choose Codeium (now Windsurf) if you want a free, fast cloud-hosted completion experience without configuring API keys or managing model routing yourself.

    Codeium (Devin Desktop) - Pros & Cons

    Pros

    • Bundles a real IDE, frontier model access, and Devin Cloud agents at $20/month — competitive with Cursor
    • SWE 1.6 (Cognition's own coding model) is free on Pro+ and is improving fast as a first-party model
    • Agent Client Protocol and parallel session management are genuinely useful for multi-agent workflows

    Cons

    • Rebrand from Codeium / Windsurf to Devin Desktop has created naming confusion across docs and tutorials
    • Free plan is now meaningfully more limited than the original Codeium free-forever autocomplete
    • $200/mo Max plan matches Cursor Ultra without a clear quality advantage on frontier model output

    Continue - Pros & Cons

    Pros

    • Truly BYOK across 15+ providers — nothing is hard-wired to a single vendor
    • Apache 2.0 core makes procurement trivial for regulated enterprises
    • Continue Hub lets platform teams ship a standard assistant to every developer
    • First-class MCP client so team MCP servers become instantly reusable
    • Works in both VS Code and JetBrains — one config across polyglot teams

    Cons

    • You are responsible for choosing and paying providers — no all-in-one price
    • Autocomplete quality depends heavily on which model you route to
    • Agent mode is competent but less aggressive than Cursor Composer or Cascade
    • Hub adoption still evolving; block ecosystem smaller than closed marketplaces
    • Teams tier pricing is not published — expect a sales conversation for real orgs

    Not sure which to pick?

    🎯 Take our quiz →
    🦞

    New to AI tools?

    Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

    🔔

    Price Drop Alerts

    Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

    Tracking 2 tools

    We only email when prices actually change. No spam, ever.

    Get weekly AI agent tool insights

    Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

    No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

    Ready to Choose?

    Read the full reviews to make an informed decision