Cline vs Continue

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

Cline

🔴Developer

AI Coding

Open-source autonomous coding agent that runs as a VS Code (and JetBrains) extension, using your own API keys to plan, edit files, run terminal commands, and iterate against real feedback — the reference implementation of a transparent agentic coding loop.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Free

Continue

🔴Developer

Developer Tools

Open-source AI coding assistant for VS Code and JetBrains — bring any model, any MCP server, and share reusable rules and agents across your team via Continue Hub.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Free

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

FeatureClineContinue
CategoryAI CodingDeveloper Tools
Pricing Plans3 listed plans4 listed plans
Starting PriceFreeFree
Key Features
  • • Open-source coding agent runtime for VS Code, CLI, and SDK embedding
  • • Bring-your-own-key support for OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and other model providers
  • • MCP Marketplace for connecting agent tools and context
  • • Multi-model AI support including OpenAI, Claude, Gemini, and local models
  • • Native IDE extensions for VS Code and JetBrains with smooth workflow integration
  • • MCP server connectivity for development toolchain integration

Cline - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • ✓Shows proposed edits and commands before execution
  • ✓Supports many hosted and local model providers instead of locking users to one
  • ✓Checkpoint history makes experimental agent runs easier to unwind
  • ✓Deep MCP support connects browsers, databases, tickets, and internal tools

Cons

  • ✗BYO-model usage can become expensive during long agent loops
  • ✗Frequent approval prompts trade autonomy for safety
  • ✗Output quality and cost vary substantially by selected model
  • ✗Managed and team pricing needs vendor confirmation

Continue - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • ✓Open-source assistant for VS Code and JetBrains. This directly supports the primary workflow.
  • ✓Bring-your-own-model: Anthropic, OpenAI, Ollama, local, any provider.
  • ✓First-class MCP client — any MCP server becomes callable tools.
  • ✓Continue Hub for sharing assistants, rules, prompts across a team.

Cons

  • ✗At least one tier requires a sales quote, preventing a complete public budget calculation.
  • ✗Features and limits can change by plan, billing interval, region, and release; verify current documentation.
  • ✗MCP connectivity expands the permission surface and requires narrow scopes, approvals, logs, and credential rotation.
  • ✗A representative pilot is necessary because a feature list does not establish reliability or operational fit.

Not sure which to pick?

🎯 Take our quiz →
🦞

New to AI tools?

Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

🔔

Price Drop Alerts

Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

Tracking 2 tools

We only email when prices actually change. No spam, ever.

Get weekly AI agent tool insights

Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ready to Choose?

Read the full reviews to make an informed decision