Apify vs Firecrawl

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

Apify

🔴Developer

web data

web scraping, browser automation, and data extraction platform with ready-made Actors for collecting web data for AI workflows.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Free

Firecrawl

🔴Developer

Web Scraping

Web scraping, crawling, and search API that turns any website into clean Markdown or structured data for AI agents and LLMs.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Free

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

FeatureApifyFirecrawl
Categoryweb dataWeb Scraping
Pricing Plans116 tiers396 tiers
Starting PriceFreeFree
Key Features
  • Web scraping with 1,500+ pre-built Actors
  • Managed proxy rotation (datacenter and residential)
  • JavaScript rendering and dynamic content handling
  • Web Scraping and Crawling Engine
  • LLM-Ready Markdown Conversion
  • Structured Data Extraction

💡 Our Take

Choose Firecrawl if you want a focused, API-first tool that converts URLs to LLM-ready markdown with minimal configuration. Choose Apify if you need a full scraping platform with a marketplace of pre-built actors, scheduled runs, and storage — Apify is more versatile for general scraping workflows but requires more setup for AI-specific output.

Apify - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Huge Actor marketplace shortens build time compared with writing every scraper from scratch
  • Good fit for AI pipelines because results land in structured datasets instead of screenshots or brittle copy-paste flows
  • Scheduling, proxies, storage, and APIs are bundled, which reduces glue code for production scraping
  • MCP support makes Apify more agent-friendly than many traditional scraping tools

Cons

  • Costs can rise fast when Actors use heavy browser sessions, proxies, or high-volume datasets
  • Marketplace Actor quality varies, so production teams still need monitoring and fallback plans
  • Legal and compliance review is still your job; Apify does not make every target site safe to scrape

Firecrawl - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • One API replaces a custom Chromium + proxy + parser stack
  • Schema-constrained /extract is a huge win for product and directory scraping
  • Official MCP server gives Claude Desktop and Cursor live web access in seconds
  • First-class adapters in LangChain, LlamaIndex, and CrewAI
  • Clean Markdown output drops straight into RAG pipelines

Cons

  • Credits burn quickly when /extract or PDF parsing runs on every page
  • Hobby tier is generous for trials but small for production crawls
  • Auth-gated dashboards and heavily modal UIs still require workarounds
  • Concurrency caps on lower tiers slow large-site crawls

Not sure which to pick?

🎯 Take our quiz →

🔒 Security & Compliance Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

Security FeatureApifyFirecrawl
SOC2✅ Yes
GDPR✅ Yes
HIPAA
SSO
Self-Hosted🔀 Hybrid
On-Prem✅ Yes
RBAC
Audit Log
Open Source✅ Yes
API Key Auth✅ Yes
Encryption at Rest✅ Yes
Encryption in Transit✅ Yes
Data Residency
Data Retentionconfigurable
🦞

New to AI tools?

Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

🔔

Price Drop Alerts

Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

Tracking 2 tools

We only email when prices actually change. No spam, ever.

Get weekly AI agent tool insights

Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ready to Choose?

Read the full reviews to make an informed decision