All Hands AI (OpenHands) vs Continue

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

All Hands AI (OpenHands)

🔴Developer

AI Coding

Open-source platform for cloud coding agents — formerly OpenDevin — usable as CLI, web GUI, or SDK.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Custom

Continue

🔴Developer

AI Coding

Open-source AI coding extension for VS Code and JetBrains — bring any model, configure custom rules, share assistants across your team.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Custom

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

FeatureAll Hands AI (OpenHands)Continue
CategoryAI CodingAI Coding
Pricing Plans6 tiers36 tiers
Starting Price
Key Features
    • Multi-model AI support including OpenAI, Claude, Gemini, and local models
    • Native IDE extensions for VS Code and JetBrains with smooth workflow integration
    • MCP server connectivity for development toolchain integration

    All Hands AI (OpenHands) - Pros & Cons

    Pros

    • Genuinely open — tens of thousands of GitHub stars and active community PRs
    • Three usable surfaces (CLI/GUI/SDK) cover both interactive and embedded use cases
    • Model-agnostic, so you avoid vendor lock-in on the inference layer
    • Strong SWE-Bench numbers give defensible eval-based credibility
    • Air-gapped/self-hosted deployment is a real option for regulated enterprises

    Cons

    • Self-hosted setup has more moving parts than commercial competitors
    • Cloud-tier pricing is usage-based and can be hard to forecast for heavy users
    • Agent quality depends heavily on which underlying model you choose
    • Documentation is good but moves fast — version skew between releases happens
    • Newer enterprise features (SSO, audit) lag behind dedicated commercial vendors

    Continue - Pros & Cons

    Pros

    • Open-source under Apache 2.0 — no vendor lock-in or proprietary protocols
    • Genuinely supports JetBrains as a first-class citizen, not an afterthought
    • YAML config and Continue Hub make team-wide standardization trivial
    • Transparent pricing: $3/M tokens Starter, $20/seat/month Team — no hidden seat costs
    • Mix local and hosted models in one extension — cheap autocomplete, expensive chat
    • Strong on-prem story for regulated enterprises (BYOK, internal proxies, no telemetry)

    Cons

    • Less polished UX than closed-source competitors like Cursor or GitHub Copilot
    • Agent mode is younger than Cline's and has fewer guardrails
    • Hub assistants quality varies — vetting community configs takes effort
    • $3/M tokens Starter is competitive but not the cheapest if you BYO API keys directly

    Not sure which to pick?

    🎯 Take our quiz →
    🦞

    New to AI tools?

    Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

    🔔

    Price Drop Alerts

    Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

    Tracking 2 tools

    We only email when prices actually change. No spam, ever.

    Get weekly AI agent tool insights

    Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

    No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

    Ready to Choose?

    Read the full reviews to make an informed decision