Aider vs Continue

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

Aider

🔴Developer

AI Coding

Terminal-based AI pair programmer that edits your repo and commits changes via git — the Unix-philosophy alternative to GUI AI IDEs.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Free

Continue

🔴Developer

AI Coding

Open-source AI coding extension for VS Code and JetBrains — bring any model, configure custom rules, share assistants across your team.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Custom

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

FeatureAiderContinue
CategoryAI CodingAI Coding
Pricing Plans14 tiers36 tiers
Starting PriceFree
Key Features
  • Terminal-based AI pair programming
  • Direct file editing with Git auto-commits
  • Multi-model support (Claude, GPT-4o, DeepSeek, local)
  • Multi-model AI support including OpenAI, Claude, Gemini, and local models
  • Native IDE extensions for VS Code and JetBrains with smooth workflow integration
  • MCP server connectivity for development toolchain integration

Aider - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Free and open source under Apache 2.0 — no platform markup, you pay only the underlying model APIs
  • Top-of-leaderboard accuracy on SWE-bench Verified thanks to strict diff-edit format
  • Works with any LLM, including fully local models via Ollama, so you can use Aider air-gapped
  • Every change becomes a git commit — rollback is `git revert`, history is your AI audit log
  • Architect/editor mode lets you mix expensive reasoning models with cheap edit models
  • No IDE lock-in — runs in any terminal, plays well with tmux, vim, neovim, emacs

Cons

  • Terminal UX has a learning curve compared to GUI tools like Cursor or Windsurf
  • No real-time autocomplete — Aider is conversational, not completion-style
  • Web browser tools and screenshot uploads require manual paste, not native capture
  • On very large monorepos the repo map step can be slow on first run

Continue - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Open-source under Apache 2.0 — no vendor lock-in or proprietary protocols
  • Genuinely supports JetBrains as a first-class citizen, not an afterthought
  • YAML config and Continue Hub make team-wide standardization trivial
  • Transparent pricing: $3/M tokens Starter, $20/seat/month Team — no hidden seat costs
  • Mix local and hosted models in one extension — cheap autocomplete, expensive chat
  • Strong on-prem story for regulated enterprises (BYOK, internal proxies, no telemetry)

Cons

  • Less polished UX than closed-source competitors like Cursor or GitHub Copilot
  • Agent mode is younger than Cline's and has fewer guardrails
  • Hub assistants quality varies — vetting community configs takes effort
  • $3/M tokens Starter is competitive but not the cheapest if you BYO API keys directly

Not sure which to pick?

🎯 Take our quiz →
🦞

New to AI tools?

Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

🔔

Price Drop Alerts

Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

Tracking 2 tools

We only email when prices actually change. No spam, ever.

Get weekly AI agent tool insights

Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ready to Choose?

Read the full reviews to make an informed decision