Aider vs Continue

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

Aider

🔴Developer

AI Coding Assistant

Open-source terminal coding agent that pairs with git, edits multiple files at once, and works with any leading LLM.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Free
Full ReviewVisit Site

Continue

🔴Developer

AI Coding Assistant

Open-source AI code assistant for VS Code and JetBrains — bring your own models, curate a shared block library, ship as an internal platform.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Custom
Full ReviewVisit Site

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

FeatureAiderContinue
CategoryAI Coding AssistantAI Coding Assistant
Pricing Plans14 tiers36 tiers
Starting PriceFree
Key Features
  • • Terminal-based AI pair programming
  • • Direct file editing with Git auto-commits
  • • Multi-model support (Claude, GPT-4o, DeepSeek, local)
  • • Multi-model AI support including OpenAI, Claude, Gemini, and local models
  • • Native IDE extensions for VS Code and JetBrains with smooth workflow integration
  • • MCP server connectivity for development toolchain integration

Aider - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • ✓Truly free and open-source (Apache 2.0) with no commercial upsell
  • ✓Model-agnostic BYOK across 20+ providers, including self-hosted Ollama/vLLM
  • ✓Every edit is a git commit with a real message — trivial to review and undo
  • ✓Publishes the most-cited independent code-editing benchmark leaderboard
  • ✓Runs in any terminal — no IDE lock-in, works over SSH and inside tmux

Cons

  • ✗Terminal-only; no IDE UI for hover, inline diff, or CodeLens-style affordances
  • ✗Steep learning curve compared to click-to-accept IDE agents like Cursor
  • ✗Repo-map indexing on huge monorepos can chew tokens and needs manual tuning
  • ✗MCP client support is still marked experimental

Continue - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • ✓Truly BYOK across 15+ providers — nothing is hard-wired to a single vendor
  • ✓Apache 2.0 core makes procurement trivial for regulated enterprises
  • ✓Continue Hub lets platform teams ship a standard assistant to every developer
  • ✓First-class MCP client so team MCP servers become instantly reusable
  • ✓Works in both VS Code and JetBrains — one config across polyglot teams

Cons

  • ✗You are responsible for choosing and paying providers — no all-in-one price
  • ✗Autocomplete quality depends heavily on which model you route to
  • ✗Agent mode is competent but less aggressive than Cursor Composer or Cascade
  • ✗Hub adoption still evolving; block ecosystem smaller than closed marketplaces
  • ✗Teams tier pricing is not published — expect a sales conversation for real orgs

Not sure which to pick?

🎯 Take our quiz →
🦞

New to AI tools?

Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

Read Guides →
🔔

Price Drop Alerts

Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

Tracking 2 tools

We only email when prices actually change. No spam, ever.

Get weekly AI agent tool insights

Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ready to Choose?

Read the full reviews to make an informed decision

Review AiderReview Continue