Activepieces vs Zapier

Detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right tool

Activepieces

Automation & Workflows

Activepieces review: open-source visual workflows, AI agents, tables, chat, MCP connections, TypeScript steps, and 760+ app integrations.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

$0
Full ReviewVisit Site

Zapier

🟢No Code

Automation

No-code automation platform with AI workflows, agents, and MCP access to app actions.

Was this helpful?

Starting Price

Free
Full ReviewVisit Site

Feature Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

FeatureActivepiecesZapier
CategoryAutomation & WorkflowsAutomation
Pricing Plans4 listed plans4 listed plans
Starting Price$0Free
Key Features
  • • AI agents with custom instructions and tools
  • • Visual drag-and-drop flow builder
  • • 689+ native integrations
  • • Workflow Runtime
  • • Tool and API Connectivity
  • • State and Context Handling

💡 Our Take

Choose Activepieces if you run high-volume workflows, need self-hosting or data residency, or want flat-rate pricing that doesn't scale with executions. Choose Zapier if you need the broadest integration catalog (7,000+ apps vs. 689+) and value a mature ecosystem with extensive tutorials and community support.

Activepieces - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • ✓One ordinary flow run costs one credit regardless of step count
  • ✓Free tier and transparent annual pricing
  • ✓Open-source integrations and self-hosting reduce lock-in
  • ✓Visual builder retains a TypeScript escape hatch
  • ✓Native MCP direction fits agent workflows

Cons

  • ✗AI model steps and agent actions consume extra credits
  • ✗Self-hosting shifts upgrades, security, and reliability to the operator
  • ✗Connector breadth is smaller than Zapier's ecosystem
  • ✗Community pieces require code and permission review

Zapier - Pros & Cons

Pros

  • ✓A broad connector catalog shortens integration work for common SaaS products
  • ✓No-code configuration lets operations teams own straightforward workflows
  • ✓Paths, filters, and multi-step actions support more than simple one-to-one syncs

Cons

  • ✗Task-based billing can become expensive at volume and exact current rates need verification
  • ✗Complex workflows can be difficult to debug without disciplined naming and logging
  • ✗A connector may expose only part of an underlying product API

Not sure which to pick?

🎯 Take our quiz →

🔒 Security & Compliance Comparison

Scroll horizontally to compare details.

Security FeatureActivepiecesZapier
SOC2—✅ Yes
GDPR—✅ Yes
HIPAA—❌ No
SSO—✅ Yes
Self-Hosted—❌ No
On-Prem—❌ No
RBAC—✅ Yes
Audit Log—✅ Yes
Open Source—❌ No
API Key Auth—✅ Yes
Encryption at Rest—✅ Yes
Encryption in Transit—✅ Yes
Data Residency—US
Data Retention—configurable
🦞

New to AI tools?

Read practical guides for choosing and using AI tools

Read Guides →
🔔

Price Drop Alerts

Get notified when AI tools lower their prices

Tracking 2 tools

We only email when prices actually change. No spam, ever.

Get weekly AI agent tool insights

Comparisons, new tool launches, and expert recommendations delivered to your inbox.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ready to Choose?

Read the full reviews to make an informed decision

Review ActivepiecesReview Zapier